Methodology
Based on Grammarly's official grammar-check page checked September 7, 2026, plus an original editorial exercise. This exercise has not been run in Grammarly. Suggested corrections below are written by our publication, not recorded product output.
Products Covered
- Grammarlyfrom $30/mo · pick: Free first; Pro annually for committed usersPrice updated 2026-09-06; verify on the official website.
- QuillBotfrom $19.95/mo · pick: Free firstPrice updated 2026-09-06; verify on the official website.
Start with a message you can verify
Use this fictional input: ‘Hi Morgan, our team have finished the outline. We expects to share two draft pages on Thursday. Could you confirm which example is most useful? The final schedule is not approved yet.’ This contains deliberate grammar issues and an important qualification. Do not replace it with private client correspondence for a first experiment.
Write down four facts before editing: the outline is complete; there are two draft pages; Thursday is the expected sharing date; the final schedule is unapproved. These are the acceptance criteria for the edit. A grammatical sentence that changes one of them fails the exercise.
Review the proposed grammar changes
The official checker accepts text and highlights suggestions that you can inspect and accept. Look at each suggestion in context. For this exercise, ‘We expect’ is an editorial correction to ‘We expects’. Collective-noun agreement in ‘our team have’ can depend on the variety of English; decide which style your readers expect before standardizing it.
Keep a copy of the original and note why you accepted or rejected each change. Do not treat a high writing score as evidence that a deadline or statement is correct. The product cannot establish whether your team actually completed the work.
Protect the difference between an estimate and a promise
Compare the edited sentence against ‘expects to share’. Reject any revision that silently promises delivery. Likewise, keep the final sentence about the unapproved schedule. Removing it might make the email shorter but less accurate.
Read the final version aloud. The reader should know what is finished, what is expected next and what you need from them. If a formal rewrite feels unnatural for an established colleague, keep the simpler version.
Choose the tool for the editing job
Grammarly's grammar checker is a starting point for reviewing corrections. If the task instead calls for exploring alternative wording, the separate QuillBot email workflow on this site offers a paraphrasing exercise. Neither approach replaces checking your source facts.
Begin with available free features. Only consider a subscription after identifying a recurring limitation. Record the exact suggestion you needed, whether it was available and how much review remained. This publication has not measured accuracy, speed or a paid-plan advantage for this exercise.